Skip to main content

Babies, Babies, Babies

In an earlier post, I posed the question, "Why do romance novels assume that a baby = HEA (Happily Ever After)?"  To me and to many other women like me, babies are not the be all and end all.  I, personally, do not need a baby to feel complete, but so many romance novels use the presence of babies as an indication of how happy a couple is.  For instance, a few years back I read the matchmakers series by Candace Camp and the epilogue to the last book had every single couple happily cooing at a baby or two.  In historicals, like that series, it makes a little more sense to give the protagonists children because having kids was a huge facet of noble life--without children, especially male children, the family seat would transfer to some evil relation, who cares only for himself and would probably tear down the ancestral house and build something *gasp* modern or would treat the tenants in awful ways.  However, in contemporary novels it isn't essential for the happy couple to end up with the 2.5 kids, a golden retriever, and a white picket fence.  Not every couple wants that, and the fact that romance novels perpetuate that ideal really alienates an entire segment of the reading population.

One of the main reasons I love the In Death series is because Eve does not want kids and that she can be happy without having them.  I have no doubt that somewhere down the line, she will end up with a kid, but it doesn't have to be right now.  (Nora Roberts has said that if Eve and Roarke have a baby that would be the end of the series because things would change drastically about the way Eve performs as a cop.)  Even though Roarke does want children, he doesn't pressure Eve into having them just because he wants them.  He is more than willing to wait until she is ready.

The reason I am going off on this baby tangent is that the book that I am currently reading, Any Duchess Will Do by Tessa Dare, seems to be leading to the baby = HEA ending.  I've gotten about half way through the book, and the hero, Griff, really wants kids, although he doesn't come out and say it--at least, he hasn't yet.  I read a scene earlier in which Griff, his mother, and Pauline, the heroine, are visiting The Foundling Hospital, an orphanage, and he is visibly sick over being there.  It doesn't appear that his aversion to the place is an aversion to children--he was really good with a little boy at the beginning of the scene--not to mention the fact that he suddenly decided to live like a monk, forgoing the life of debauchery that he had been living up until about a year earlier.  He is very obviously a tortured hero and I think it is fair to say that something happened to him in the last year--I have a feeling that he got some girl pregnant and that she and the baby died in child birth.  Griff's grieving; it isn't hard to see, and it is quite obvious that Pauline is going to make everything better for him, which of course means that she is going to have a kid and not die in labor.

What is refreshing is the fact that it is Griff that wants babies and not Pauline, however, it still doesn't negate the fact that in his perfect world happiness means having a baby.  You really don't know how perturbed this makes me.  It is almost as bad as the whole Big City = Big Bad and Small Town = Perfection trope that has been shoved down readers' throats since possibly the dawn of time.  I just wish that there were more books about people like me, who don't necessarily believe that babies are essential to happiness.

Comments

  1. Do you by chance have other books (know of others) that are romance sans kids-hea?
    Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  2. There are tons of romances without the baby HEA. I recently finished Jill Shavlis's It Had to be You and the couple ended up just dating in the end--it is part of a series, so they may eventually end up married with kids (cue Ed O'Neil and Katey Segal), but their story's ending didn't have them running around with a brood of kids. I'm currently reading the next book in that series, Always on my Mind, and while I haven't finished it yet, I don't think it will have that type of an ending either.

    The In Death series by J.D. Robb is futuristic romantic suspense and the author has said that while the series is going on there is not going to be a baby for Eve and Roarke because that would impede Eve doing her job the way she does it. Of course them having a kid is always in the cards in the end, but there isn't going to be one until it ends and the nice thing with this series is that you can see that they don't need a baby to be happy and complete. (There is a baby in the series, though--Eve's best friend and her husband had a baby a while back, but she wasn't inserted to make me believe that Mavis and Leonardo needed her to be happy.)

    Most of Karen Rose's romantic suspense novels have baby-less happy endings, although some of her heroines have eventually had kids in other books, but as with the In Death novels, it wasn't about getting the couple a baby by the end of their book as a way to prove that they're happy and meant to be (because, obviously, having kids doesn't necessarily mean that a couple will be together forever).

    Julie James's US Attorney series is another one that leaves the baby thing to be a natural progression in later books rather than as a same book epilogue, which is a good thing because most of those books take place in a very short period of time. As of now, one of her couples is pregnant and I believe they're the only ones that are even married.

    I think the baby as a happy ending thing is mostly done in Historical Romances, even though they do happen with contemporaries too, and this is probably because of the way things were back in the 18th, 19th, and even early 20th centuries when people got married and had kids because it was expected of them. It was a bit of a societal thing, especially with the aristocracy because heirs were needed to keep the titles in the family. I find it rare for there to be a historical without babies being a part of things (a lot of the time they're being used as part of the motivation for the man to settle down; it was a responsibility not something that they wanted just because they wanted a family). One of the things I love about Lauren Willig's Pink Carnation series is that her heroines don't push for babies and despite knowing that most of them eventually have kids (because part of it takes place in the present with the descendent of the first book's protagonists), I know that it wasn't a HEA thing or even a responsibility thing it was because it came out of their love. It wasn't meant to show me they were happy the way it is in a lot of books.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Throwback Review: The Dream Trilogy by Nora Roberts

There are some books that stick with you no matter how long it has been since you first read them.  For me, the Dream Trilogy has always been in the back of my head.  I probably read them a good 15 years ago and the last time was a good 10 years back.  As a matter of fact, that trilogy was part of the first round of books I purchased when I got my first kindle for my 24th birthday (I never actually read it after buying the digital version; I guess I just needed to know that I could read them if I wanted.


The first book of the trilogy, Daring to Dream, was released in 1996 when I was just 10 years old and more concerned with passing math (I did, but not without many a night of struggling to remember what the E in PEMDAS meant) than I was with the goings on of fictional characters inside the pages of a book.  In fact, if I read at all during that time period it was to get a free pan pizza through Pizza Hut and the Book It! program.  I've mentioned this a few times before, but I act…

Blog Tour: Excerpt and Review of "Lord of Chance" by Erica Ridley

Title: Lord of Chance Author: Erica Ridley ISBN: 1943794049 Publisher: Webmotion Series: Rogues to Riches #1 Price: $7.99 (paperback) $3.99 (e-book) $9.97 (Audible Audio)
Rating: ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ 





I was recently given the opportunity to take part in a Blog Tour for the newest Erica Ridley novel, Lord of Chance, and as I've liked her books in the past, I decided to do it.  The publisher quickly provided me with  a whole folder full of goodies, so without further ado:
The Excerpt
'Charlotte harrumphed to hide her amusement. “How are you at pressing wrinkles from gowns?” “Let me assure you,” Mr. Fairfax informed her with utter seriousness, “that I have never worn a wrinkled gown in all my life.” “Very gentlemanly.” She tried not to smile. “Let’s see your skill as maid-of-all-work, then. My gowns are in the wardrobe, as is my traveling iron. See what you can do.” “At your service.” He bowed, then turned and marched to the wardrobe like a soldier off to war. Now that he couldn’t see her, she let her…

Review of "Pretty Face" by Lucy Parker

Pretty Face is pretty fucking awesome.  There, I said it.  I first picked it up based on all the squeeing about Ms. Parker's first book, Act Like It, which I am sad to say, I still have not read, despite said squeeing.  I don't usually read books by authors I know are British and I'm sure this comes from all those stuffy classics I had to read in high school.  Granted, many of those classics were written by American authors (I still have nightmares about reading Moby Dick--Mr Sullivan, if you are out there and have stumbled on my blog, I'm sorry, but Melville was an awful writer, who used the English language as a torture device), but still, there seems to be some type of block in my brain that stops me from wanting to read something by a British author.  I'm glad I made an exception for Ms. Parker.

Luc Savage is in the middle of a crisis: he can't find anyone to play Elizabeth I in the new play that he is producing.  While he's used to dealing with actors…

Blog Tour and Review of " A Lady's Code of Misconduct" by Meredith Duran

I'm going to be honest.  When I first got the email about being a part of this blog tour, I was ecstatic.  I've only read one Meredith Duran before this (Sweetest Regret, a novella part of a 2015 Christmas Anthology), but that one was so good that I had a bit of a fangirl moment as I responded.  I wish that what I got was as good as the anticipation of the thing itself.

From the Publisher:

A DEAL WITH THE DEVIL…
Trapped in the countryside, facing an unwanted marriage and the theft of her fortune, Jane Mason is done behaving nicely. To win her freedom, she’ll strike a deal with the most dangerous man she knows—a rising star in politics, whose dark good looks mask an even darker heart.
…NEVER GOES TO PLAN.
The bitter past has taught Crispin Burke to trust no one. He’ll gladly help a lovely young heiress, provided she pays a price. Yet when a single mistake shatters his life, it is Jane who holds the key to his salvation. And in a world that no longer makes sense, Crispin slowly rea…

Review of "The Thing About Love" by Julie James

Title: The Thing About Love
Author: Julie James
ISBN: 0425273776
Publisher: Berkley
Series: FBI/US Attorney Book #7
Price: $10.99 (paperback) $8.99 (e-book) $15.74 (Audible Audio)
Rating: ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ 1/2

From The Publisher
Two undercover FBI agents can hide who they are from everyone but each other in the latest novel from the New York Times bestselling author of Suddenly One Summer.
After spending six years in Los Angeles—and the last six months wondering how her marriage fell apart—FBI Special Agent Jessica Harlow is looking for a fresh start. When she finds out that the Chicago field office has an opening for an undercover agent, returning to her hometown seems like the perfect answer. But her new partner, John Shepherd, is someone she never expected to see again. Six years ago, the cocky Army Ranger was her top competition at the FBI Academy, and the one man who got under her skin like no other. 
Just one assignment away from joining the FBI's elite Hostage Rescue Team, John isn't g…