Skip to main content

Telling Someone to "Grow Up" via the Internet is the Equivalent of Throwing a Temper Tantrum

That's some title, isn't it?  My old psych professors would shudder at its lack of brevity that's for sure.  It does, however, get right to the point of this post, which is going to be a bit of a rant over an attack on a comment I made about why I do not like the Outlander series by Diana Gabaldon and why I plan on skipping the television show that is being made based on it.

Let me explain a bit: a few years ago, I attempted to read the first book in the series because I had heard some really good things about it.  Plus, time travel.  Unfortunately, it was the ultimate DNF for me.  I don't remember how far I got into the book before I forcefully deleted it from my Kindle, thanking God that I hadn't paid a dime for it, but what I do remember was my disgust over the fact that Claire, the heroine, was married (happily enough to be having sex with her husband within the first few pages).  Yep, she was married and since she would soon fall through a wormhole, there was definitely not going to be a divorce.  Now, I don't expect my romance novel heroines to be perfect (wouldn't that be boring?), but what I do expect is that they be free to enter into an adult relationship.  Being married is the total opposite of that.  (Also, it turns out that Claire is knocked up when she falls through said wormhole and it is revealed in another book that Claire manages to get the baby back to her husband in the 1940's, leaving her.  What a wonderful person she is.)

Not long after I stopped reading, I found out about a scene in which Jamie, the hero--I use this term extremely loosely--, beats Claire.  Okay, yes, many men beat their wives/girlfriends/children throughout history, but not ALL of them did.  There was no need for Jamie to beat Claire, especially since his reasoning was that if he didn't beat her he would lose his standing within the Scottish highlander community.  Poor baby.  Being a decent human being = not being a man.  Right.  Thanks for that lesson.  I could have lived my entire life without learning that.

Fast forward to the present.  It turns out that Outlander is being made into a t.v. show by Starz and I'll admit that I was curious about the casting choices, so I checked out an article posted on TVLine.com to see if the man they casted as Jamie is at all similar to how I pictured him (he is, which is really cool).  I ended up commenting on the article because the amount of squeeing over this book was disturbing.  Here is my comment:
This is one series i won’t be watching. I tried reading the first book and once i realized that Claire was married–somewhat happily–before falling through the wormhole, i was done. there is nothing romantic about adultery. Then, of course is the fact that Jamie beats Claire. Sorry. Not happening.

This, apparently, made all the fangirls'/fanboys' heads explode because there was a bunch of hate sent my way just because I disagreed with them.  Basically, they all claimed that historical accuracy is more important than not offending people.  Okay, let's look at this argument for a minute.  First of all, historical accuracy is all fine and good (I definitely do not want to see a cell phone in a book taking place any time prior to the mid-1980's), but was this bit of accuracy really necessary?  We know that men of any time in history have used their fists on anyone that they wanted to intimidate.  Do we really need to see it in a book or on television just because it may have been acceptable some time in the past?  No.  We don't.

Next, there is the idea that not wanting to offend people is LESS important than historical accuracy.  I'm sorry--wait, no I'm not--but you are wrong.  The people that are being offended might very well have been abused in the past and if that is the case, the offense is more than likely coming from the onslaught of negative emotions that is coming at them.  Many victims of abuse suffer from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and scenes like that can very well trigger a back slide in their recovery, flooding them with vicious memories.

Now, I may not agree with those comments, but everyone is entitled to their opinion (no matter how wrong it is).  There were, however, two other comments (there may have been more, but after two I was seeing all shades of red) that really pissed me off.  Here's the first, written by someone nicknamed CGSmiles:
then forget the books and DON’T WATCH THE SERIES…ENOUGH SAID..GEEZZZZZZZ…GROW UP…

Nice, right?  I don't agree with him/her, so I need to "grow up."  How very adult of you to point that out.  Listen, if you want someone to respect your opinion, then maybe you should respect theirs.  Isn't that taught in Kindergarten?  It is time to put on your Big Girl Panties and Man Up.  Not everyone is going to agree with you and if your go to response is "grow up," you're going to have a lot of problems in the real world.  Try telling your boss or your co-workers that the next time they don't agree with you.  See how far that gets you--my guess is right to the front of the Unemployment Line.

Then, there was this comment by Meg:
IT WAS A SPANKING. We get your position, as you’ve posted it plenty, find a new page to troll.

Let me clarify something.  In Meg's world, plenty means 1 comment (my original) and then two defenses against the aforementioned attacks.  I must remember that plenty = 3.  Thanks, Meg!  Now, here's a lesson for you: just because someone disagrees with you does not mean that they are a troll.  It means that SOMEONE DISAGREED WITH YOU.  As people do.  All the time.  If you have not learned this lesson by now, there really is no helping you.

Here's another lesson for you, Meg.  Yes, it was a spanking.  However, it was a spanking that was used to portray Jamie's dominance over Claire so that he would not look like a weenus to his fellow Neanderthals.  Can't we agree that beating women, NO MATTER HOW "CIVILIZED" THE BEATING WAS, is WRONG?  Not all men felt the need to beat their wives, and while some did, that doesn't make it okay.  At all.  The fact that so many people don't see anything wrong with this is more than a little scary, especially in a world where Rush Limbaugh felt comfortable enough calling a woman a slut just because she wanted the pill to be covered by insurance and where politicians can quietly pass laws requiring transvaginal ultra-sounds, which are painful and incredibly invasive, just because they think that it will shame women into keeping babies that they do not want or cannot afford to take care of.  People need to wake up or we'll end up right back there being beaten with Claire.   We cannot let that happen.

Comments

  1. I love Outlander, I love Diana, (yes, I've met her and spent time with her in real life) and I particularly love the controversy created by her books, precisely because they provide such fascinating discussions. This is a 'big idea' kind of book, not a formula romance novel, so it's going to raise issues. The themes are complex.

    Face it, life wasn't the same in the 1700s for women. They WERE property. (Heck, my own mother was not considered a 'person' under law when she was born!) Having a modern woman face the issues, rather than pretend they don't exist is the whole point. How would YOU respond in similar situation? It's all context. It's not a black and white world, and Diana paints the real shades of grey. I love her for asking the real "What IF?" of her imaginary scenario predicated on time travel, and not sanitizing any of it. That would have been wimpy. Writing about something isn't promoting something. It's revealing it for people to look at, consider, and debate. I hope I do that with my own books: Raise real questions. Prompt debate.

    You're free to disagree. :-)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fifteen Years Later: Review of "His Sinful Touch" by Candace Camp

Title: His Sinful Touch
Author: Candace Camp
ISBN: 0373789963
Publisher: HQN
Series: Mad Morelands #5
Price: $5.98 (Paperback) $5.99 (e-book) $19.96(Audible)
Rating:⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2


Most readers remember their first, the first book of their particular genre that they read, whether they enjoyed the book or not.  I have two firsts--the first romance I ever read was a Harlequin Intrigue written by Amanda Stevens.  If you've read my blog before you probably already know this.  The first historical romance I read was Mesmerized by Candace Camp, which was also the first book in her Mad Morelands series.  

I was a senior in high school when this series began and I remember seeing the paperback version of Mesmerized on the shelf at the Target on Queens Blvd (yes, I spent a lot of time on Queens Blvd as a teenager), and was pulled in by the gorgeous cover.  Apparently, that book has had several covers over the last 15 years, but this is the one I remember:


Isn't it pretty?  Of course from the cover I…

Review of "New York, Actually" by Sarah Morgan

Title: New York, Actually
Author: Sarah Morgan
ISBN: 0373804105
Publisher: HQN Books
Series: From Manhattan with Love #4
Price: $5.98 (Paperback) $5.99 (e-book) $19.96 (Audible)
Rating: 🐶🐶🐶🐶1/2


If you follow me on social media, you'll have seen my posts about this book over the last week.  For the most part, they weren't very positive -- until about 20% into the book, I hated the hero.  If I could have set him on fire, I probably would have.  It was only Ms. Morgan's prose and the fact that I had been looking forward to this book for 6 months that kept me reading.  For once, I am glad I was so wrong about a character.

From the PublisherOne man. One woman. Two dogs.  Meet Molly—New York's most famous advice columnist, she considers herself an expert at relationships…as long as they're other people's. Still bruised from her last breakup, Molly is in no rush to find happily-ever-after—the only love of her life is her dalmatian, Valentine.  Meet Daniel—A cynical divorce …

Review of "A Stardance Summer" by Emily March

Title: A Stardance Summer
Author: Emily March
ISBN: 1250131685
Publisher: St. Martin's Press
Series: Eternity Springs #13
Price: $5.98 (Paperback) $7.99 (e-book) $17.13 (Audible)
Rating:No Stars


Disclaimer: I wrote this review as a part of a Blog Tour, but have since pulled out of it for obvious reasons.  I am not editing the content of the review, so any mentions of the Blog Tour remain.


****
I want to start this review by saying that this is not the type of book I usually read and had I known this, I would not have signed up for this Blog Tour.  While it does not appear as if this is being marketed as a "Christian Romance" that is exactly what this is.  As a New York-born, California-living Atheist with degrees from two liberal universities, I am not exactly the target demographic for this book (or for this author, for that matter).  Despite feeling duped by the marketing, I made the effort to read the entire thing.  Honestly, had I stopped at any point before reaching the end,…

Happy Bookaversary! A Review of "Edge of Darkness" by Karen Rose

Title: Edge of Darkness
Author: Karen Rose
ISBN: 9780399583087
Publisher: Berkeley
Series: Cincinnati Series
Price: $5.98 (Paperback) $7.99 (e-book) $28.28(Audible)
Rating:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️


It seems like I've been reading Karen Rose novels my entire life.  I remember the day I came across Count to Ten in the Duane Reade on Queens Blvd.  I'd finished the paperback I brought with me to school that day while sitting in the Dining Hall eating lunch and needed something for the long bus ride home.  I almost didn't buy it because it was $9.99 and I hadn't gotten my financial aid money yet, but the cover copy called to me.  Not even the 500+ page count could scare me away.

I recently learned that Edge of Darkness is Ms. Rose's 20th book and in a strange way, I feel like a proud mama watching her child cross the stage to get their diploma.  I'm just a big ball of happy nostalgia, thinking back to all of the other books I've read by her and hopeful about the ones to come, so befor…

The Most Wonderful Time of the Year--Christmas in September

The day after Labor Day I woke up to an email from my contacts at St. Martin’s Press, inviting me to review six of their upcoming Christmas books, all of which have release dates in early October. For most people, this would probably be a problem — who wants to think about Christmas before Halloween — but for me, I’ve always had a soft spot for the man in the red suit. Even after I stopped believing in the Christ-Myth, I still loved that one holiday. To me, Christmas represents everything that Thanksgiving is supposed to be, but with better music and no obligatory turkey. Some of my favorite books have a Christmas theme and so I jumped at the chance to review those six books (well, five of them because the sixth has to do with cowboys and if there is one sub-genre I just cannot do is cowboys). I read the first two, With This Christmas Ring by Manda Collins and Deck the Halls by Donna Alward, fairly quickly, especially since they’re both novellas. Both are being released in a little o…