Skip to main content

Review of "Supernatural Serial Killers" by Samantha Lyon and Dr. Daphne Tan

SSKI've mentioned several times that I have degrees in Criminal Justice and Psychology, but I don't think I've ever specifically written about my love of true crime.  I live on Investigation Discovery and have read more than my fair share of true crime novels.  When I saw Supernatural Serial Killers on Netgalley, I literally let out a whoop of delight, which was repeated when my request was granted the other day.  Seeing as I was currently between books, I decided now was the time to jump into this one.

SSK provides just over a dozen case studies of serial killers throughout history, all of whom have been given supernatural monikers such as vampire, werewolf, or monster.  Obviously, none of the men studied here have paranormal abilities.  They don't need to consume blood to live (although several believed that they did) and they certainly do not transform into werewolves.  However, several chapters, especially the early ones, which focused on Renaissance/Medieval murders, included the people's belief in those very creatures.  It is the inclusion of those chapters that is the book's weak points.  This is solely because these cases can be taken with a grain of salt.  No one can actually know if the alleged killers were the guilty party because at the time of the crimes people did in fact believe in vampires, werewolves, and the like.  Several times, witnesses were quoted as saying that they saw the killer transform in front of their eyes.  To this, I could only think they were all suffering from Ergot's Poisoning, causing mass hysteria.  It is the only thing that makes sense.  I would not have included any of these cases because they did not add anything to the narrative.  Even the study of Elizabeth Bathory, whose crimes are fairly well-known, was not necessary.  Lyon and Tan even point out that the witness statements in her case were unreliable. It doesn't help matters that the so-called Blood Countess was not allowed to testify in her own defense.  (What I didn't understand about her case was the fact that while everyone was certain she committed the most heinous crimes known to man, she was not put to death like all of the earlier cases examined in this tome.  Surely, this had something to do with the fact that she was near royalty (according to Lyon and Tam, she was next in line for the Polish throne--now, that's a scary thought).)

Once we are past those chapters (and into the 19th and 20th Centuries), I really enjoyed (hmm, I feel like that is not the right word for what I felt because that makes me seem morbid in the extreme) reading about crimes that we know without a shred of doubt were committed by the men convicted of them.  The most interesting studies were those on Albert Fish, Fritz Haarmann, and Jeffery Dahmer, but those (with the exception of Haarman) were crimes I was more familiar with than some of the others, many of whom I had no knowledge of prior to reading this book.

One of the things that intrigued me was Lyon and Tan's attempt at categorizing the murderers, using the Holmes and DeBurger Typology (1998), which breaks down serial killers into distinct categories (Visionary-Type: killers who claim to have auditory or visual hallucinations and that those hallucinations led them to kill, Mission-Type: killers who are on a mission to rid the world of specific groups of people, The Hedonistic-Type: Killers who kill solely because it brings them pleasure--further broken down into Lust, Thrill, Comfort, and Profit sub-categories--and Power/Control Killers: those that kill in order to gain a sense of control).  This is interesting because many books such as this one simply regurgitate the facts of the crimes and don't attempt to make any form of analysis.  This is not a story book--it is an examination and analysis of facts, which I liked.  It would have been much easier, especially since this book was obviously written for the masses and not the academic crowd, for them to simply list the nefarious deeds and point out the reasons why these murderers were given their respective monikers.

I also liked that each chapter is separated into four sections--Introduction, Crimes, Trial and Sentencing, and Discussion.  This kept things neat and reminded me of all those APA and MLA style papers I read (and wrote) in college and grad school.  While the Discussion section is the shortest, this is the part that most appealed to me because it contained the analysis of the crimes committed and the person who committed them.  This is probably because of all those psych classed that were required to get my degree.

I do feel the need to point out that gore is definitely an issue in the book.  Many of the crimes, especially the ones committed by Haarmann and Dahmer, are graphic and described as such.  There really is no way for a discussion of these murders not to be graphic.  If you're squeamish, this is not the book for you.

4 Stars

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Throwback Review: The Dream Trilogy by Nora Roberts

There are some books that stick with you no matter how long it has been since you first read them.  For me, the Dream Trilogy has always been in the back of my head.  I probably read them a good 15 years ago and the last time was a good 10 years back.  As a matter of fact, that trilogy was part of the first round of books I purchased when I got my first kindle for my 24th birthday (I never actually read it after buying the digital version; I guess I just needed to know that I could read them if I wanted.


The first book of the trilogy, Daring to Dream, was released in 1996 when I was just 10 years old and more concerned with passing math (I did, but not without many a night of struggling to remember what the E in PEMDAS meant) than I was with the goings on of fictional characters inside the pages of a book.  In fact, if I read at all during that time period it was to get a free pan pizza through Pizza Hut and the Book It! program.  I've mentioned this a few times before, but I act…

Review of "Bay of Sighs" by Nora Roberts

A couple of months ago, I volunteered to read Stars of Fortune, the first book in Nora Roberts's Guardian Trilogy for the Smart Bitches RITA Reader Challenge because ParaNoras are my crack.  If they were illegal, I'd be serving a life sentence for possession/intent to sell a controlled substance.  Unfortunately, I wasn't a fan of book 1, but I'd already requested Bay of Sighs, so I felt the need to read it too.  Plus, I liked the idea of a mermaid heroine -- one whose name was not Ariel.  I really wish I resisted reading this.  It was awful.  It took everything I hated about SoF and magnified it to the level that I wasn't able to finish it.

Annika is a mermaid, sent to "the shore up above" to stop an evil goddess from getting the Stars of Fortune.  Together with the five other guardians, she must search for the stars and protect them.  Afterwards, she must return to the sea, which wouldn't be a problem if it wasn't for Sawyer King...

Sawyer has be…

Review of "Sleepless in Manhattan" by Sarah Morgan

I bought this book with the intention of reading it on a plane from San Francisco to New York City last weekend.  Of course I read about 30% before even stepping foot onto the plane and once I was actually on it, I read maybe 5%, listening to the most recent Smart Bitches podcast and watching a few episodes of Charmed on Netflix because I had an awful night sleep the evening prior and was too tired to read.  I finally sat down to read it Sunday and Monday night.

Paige Walker has lived a sheltered life, brought low by a heart condition that had her in and out of the hospital until her late teens, but now in her late 20's she's finally healthy and happy.  She loves her life in Manhattan.  She'd felt stifled in her hometown of Puffin Island and as soon as she was able she moved to New York with her best friends, Eva and Frankie, as well as her older brother, Matt.  On the verge of a promotion at work, she figures she's got it all, but then the rug is pulled out from unde…